In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Progress does not come easily. It comes only when we solve problems and make mind-boggling discoveries. While trying to achieve the goals mentioned above, there are always hurdles, heated arguments, and discussions before we reap its benefits. It can be believed with certitude that the only way to make a move towards progress is by getting involved in discussions where people contribute their different point of views.
When it comes to solving problems, be it at the level of an obscure corporation or the national or international level, opinions that vary and encompass a wide range of issues while dealing with a problem are essential. These opinions may not always be in harmony and could also give rise to debates, but the outcome is still worthwhile. For instance, a president is accompanied by many people who would help him in decision-making and solve highly complicated issues. Issues like intolerance against Blacks or white supremacy that usually flood the newspapers of America on a regular basis, need to be analyzed deliberately and circumspectly. Hence, the president’s advisers, in their effort to find the most efficient solution to such problems need to present their divergent views so that the point offered by each adviser is studied well and taken care of. Therefore, problem-solving becomes highly efficient when a situation is analyzed from different perspectives.
Not only do such discussions solve convoluted problems, but also give way to new ideas. In any field of study, exchange of ideas occurs only when people keep their views forward. Even though the views might be contrasting and utterly antithetical to each other, they later get molded and informed by the ideas shared in such a conversation. A science student might believe that his way of approaching a problem might be the most efficient and resource-efficient way, however when his views clash with another student who objects to the approach’s efficacy, then that would certainly enhance the understanding of both students and compel them to get more profound knowledge in the subject. This, in turn, would give rise to ground-breaking innovations. So, by interchanging divergent ideas and thoughts, we unleash our potential of making discoveries, and also towards enhancing and deepening our knowledge.
Nonetheless, accepting and reworking on our ideas after facing opposition is not a trivial task. Here, we see people become chafed, cantankerous, and even morose. In such situations, creativity is lost, and while some people like to stay obstinate when it comes to promoting their views, others can become depressed and dolorous. At such a point, neither enthralling discoveries are made, nor problems are solved, but rather everything assumes a static state.
Nevertheless, since we humans are brainy enough to know the long-term consequences of our obdurateness and sadness, these emotions should not become impediments in our progress. If a discussion involving antithetical argument spurs our creativity and enhances problem-solving, then it can be said with certitude that its pros have outweighed the cons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...creativity and enhances problem-solving, then it can be said with certitude that ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2650.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 490.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40816326531 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1546531877 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563265306122 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 817.2 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9167118761 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.454545455 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0986633104822 0.243740707755 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294171339876 0.0831039109588 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295528239516 0.0758088955206 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0590858598032 0.150359130593 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229861873213 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 100.480337079 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.