In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Discussion among those with contrasting views often reaches deadlock because some people have tendency to misconstrue the failure to convince other party as their personal failure and thus are more rigid in their thoughts. Sometimes people wantonly opposes the view others in order to forestall the progress. This personal bent for not losing can not be addressed and thus, discussion among those with opposing views reaches a stalemate.
In the name of discussion people tend to be vindictive and oppose the view of other people because they want to stymie the progress.For instance, In Indian parliament, when something new- a law or scheme is brought in for the welfare of the people, those in opposition keep on opposing by pointing out the pity flaws of newly brought scheme or law. Usually, when amennding a new law, it only requires vote of 50% of member of parliament and since the ruling party is in majortiy, they always manage to bring in the law or scheme. But a opposing party will stage protest for no reason at all to hamper the progress. Therefore, contrasting view often reach impasse in such cases.
Sometimes people with opposing views can be obstinate and those with wrong views do not give in mainly because they tend to construe it as loss. Even when presented with strong evidence of what is contrary to the belief of an person, Some individual have proclivity to be inflexible and not change their view in the light of the new information. For instance, On the news channel there are debate hours conducted everyday to seek answer to the most pressing question that currently needs to be addressed. Mostly those invovled in debates belong to certain political parties. Even when it is proved that what they have to say is contadictory to the belief of majority, they will not change their views and instead they start defending their parties and portray themselves as good people.
However, discussion among those who hold contrasting views can lead to solution in the scientific community and bussiness community because these people are more interested in seeking the truth and not defending themselves. Discussion among those with opposing views reaches a solution mainly because those emobroiled in contention tend to back themselves up with credible reasons.
Therefore, depending on the kind of people involved in the discussion contrastin view can sometimes lead to solution and majority of the times the discussion is in stalemate because people involved in discussion have bent for not changin their views even when presented with new information that contradicts their bellief partly because they perceive it as losing and not reaching the solution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ecause they want to stymie the progress.For instance, In Indian parliament, when so...
^^^
Line 2, column 534, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nage to bring in the law or scheme. But a opposing party will stage protest for n...
^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ce of what is contrary to the belief of an person, Some individual have proclivity...
^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...hannel there are debate hours conducted everyday to seek answer to the most pressing que...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o be addressed. Mostly those invovled in debates belong to certain political par...
^^
Line 3, column 548, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tly those invovled in debates belong to certain political parties. Even when it ...
^^
Line 6, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng on the kind of people involved in the discussion contrastin view can sometimes...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2249.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09977324263 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65703135318 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467120181406 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 696.6 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.5252157823 60.3974514979 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.933333333 118.986275619 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4 23.4991977007 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198697566444 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782776932341 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459544421085 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133351324149 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034052021782 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.