In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev

Essay topics:

In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

To enhance progress in any situation one should analyses all aspects of that situation, the positive as well as negative point of view. I am totally agreeing with the statement that in any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting point of view. The contrasting point of view does not mean opposites arguing to others where as it means to analyzes others point of view which does not match with yours.

The Op-positional government justify this statement. In democratic country the ruling government takes decision for development according to their perspective but when op-positional government contradict the decisions then the other harmful aspects seen clearly. For example, the government took decision to demonetization of the currency to stop corruption, but the flaws of decision clearly mention by the other op-positional parties during parliamentary session. So, the progress will take speed when contrasting point of view present clearly.

Additionally, we can see it in our daily life as we always consider every possibility of changes occurs with decision. For example, I want to buy new car and I don’t have enough money to buy car and I am searching for cars on internet or visiting showrooms. When I finally get my dream car the contradictory thoughts automatically click in my mind, such as I have not enough money or if I take loan and will not able to pay back, then I will plan my car according to my budget. These type of contradictory statements helps to make good plan and enhance my progress.

Furthermore, no one like contradictory or opposing statements because they are opposite to someone’s wish. Despite of it many people always take expert opinion to enhance progress and this advice may be contradictory to their wish. For example, in our city Mayor wants to open new primary schools to help the students but the people come forward and asked for improvement in level of education in running schools. The public opinion is contradictory to Mayor’s one, but it supports to enhance education of primary schools.

Finally, based on aforementioned examples it is clear that the given statement is strengthened. The contrasting point of view helps to improve our strategies for progress and make sure the progress in any situation.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ve as well as negative point of view. I am totally agreeing with the statement that in any situatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 351, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...es not mean opposites arguing to others where as it means to analyzes others point of vi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'analyze'.
Suggestion: analyze
... arguing to others where as it means to analyzes others point of view which does not mat...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, if, may, so, then, well, for example, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 374.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19518716578 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08277638695 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516042780749 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4868321948 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.294117647 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257702230645 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893089003338 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105169373722 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148754823101 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110084867866 0.0667264976115 165% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.