Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The author concludes in his prompt that in any field business, politics, education , government those in power should step down. I think i disagree with this prompt for a couple of reasons. Firstly because of the obvious fact that all these fields have different dynamics in which they opperate hence the way in which one operates doesn't and shouldn't equate that of others. Secondly the reason given by author for his conclusion that the surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leardership isn't logically correct for eg in case of education itself if principle/dean of a school changes every five years it might leads to instability in administration of the school. Thirdly some might argue the author's conclusion is correct but if seen logically the author assumption might only be correct for the fields of politics and government only and not really true for each and every field that's out there. Lets dive a bit deeper into these examples.
So as a first, all the fields in todays modern era have different operational dynamics. This means if some method leads to betterment of any field it may not necessarily equate as betterment for another field. For example if there are lot of changes in posts of those in power in fields like defense it may render the organisations like army,navy and air force of a country unstable as they are very critical to a country's well being, safety and integrity. Moreover such organizations require experienced veterans who project their very best for the country and pass that experience down so that even more people get trained to server the country for the same. So such people cannot step down as frequent as every five years every now and then.
Also, not every enterprise's success is determined by making the new leadership to come in power. For example, if a school's principle is to step down every five years it may lead to unstability of the institute and hence lead to a poor quality of education as a result for the students in the school. Because if a schools head is to step down every now and then it'll lead to variety of network effects like it will for example probably take a lot of time for the new head to establish relationships with neighbouring institutes for competitions and things like that.
On a contrary note, some might argue that the author's conclusion is correct but I thing if seen logically the author's conclusion can at best be correct for fields of politics and to some extent for some government organisations other than defence. Because in politics if their's no other opposing party to challenge the power of ruling party they might take advantage of the situation and feed on public money without doing the public and good. Same case holds true for government field.
In conclusion, I would like to summarize that the author's conclusion that in any field those in power should step down after five years is not agreeable unless they are fields like politics and government field except the defense in light of the examples stated by me.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... any field business, politics, education , government those in power should step d...
^^
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...hose in power should step down. I think i disagree with this prompt for a couple ...
^
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ate hence the way in which one operates doesnt and shouldnt equate that of others. Sec...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...he way in which one operates doesnt and shouldnt equate that of others. Secondly the rea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 523, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... revitalization through new leardership isnt logically correct for eg in case of edu...
^^^^
Line 1, column 728, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...he school. Thirdly some might argue the authors conclusion is correct but if seen logic...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 916, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ot really true for each and every field thats out there. Lets dive a bit deeper into ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 933, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...r each and every field thats out there. Lets dive a bit deeper into these examples. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , navy
...t may render the organisations like army,navy and air force of a country unstable as ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ntrys well being, safety and integrity. Moreover such organizations require experienced ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 726, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...ep down as frequent as every five years every now and then. Also, not every enterprises succe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 17, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'enterprises'' or 'enterprise's'?
Suggestion: enterprises'; enterprise's
...very now and then. Also, not every enterprises success is determined by making the new...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 116, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...hip to come in power. For example, if a schools principle is to step down every five ye...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 343, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...cause if a schools head is to step down every now and then itll lead to variety of network effects...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 47, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ontrary note, some might argue that the authors conclusion is correct but I thing if se...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 83, Rule ID: YOU_THING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'think' or 'thinks'?
Suggestion: think; thinks
...the authors conclusion is correct but I thing if seen logically the authors conclusio...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 111, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...rrect but I thing if seen logically the authors conclusion can at best be correct for ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...if seen logically the authors conclusion can at best be correct for fields of pol...
^^
Line 17, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ion, I would like to summarize that the authors conclusion that in any field those in p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2541.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 525.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64529294798 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455238095238 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 795.6 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.7944500863 60.3974514979 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.166666667 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 23.4991977007 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.21951772744 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 19.0 7.80617977528 243% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30596169422 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102441432504 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086386788117 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178974139758 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743277182767 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.