Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Presently in many democracies and institutions run by a common consensus, leaderships are often designated for a predefined time frame. As the claim suggests, the tem wise policy accounts for timely review and evaluation of performance of the leadership throughout the tenure.
Whenever a leadership steps down there are a few things that happen; firstly there has to be a re-election or instatement of a new leadership. Often is the case that individuals working day in and day out at any job get a parochial sense of direction about that job, it is a natural tendency of out minds to put things in order to how it works best. This is where a new set of people come into the picture: the fresh leadership may or maynot be as competent or desired as the replaced leadership, but it without any will provide a new perspective to a certain organisation be it politics, business, schools, etc...
The second thing is, that the leadership position now open again, encourages competetion among contenders. This also promotes new ideas, as people contend for the position. This is an example of a meritocratic system; the position of responsibility is a lucrative one, on the contrary if no such opportunity is available, no one will bother to focus on growth.
Let us take the example of a resturant; it is often the case that it is a family business and family members run it together. It is statistically evident that most of these businesses fail to sustain, one of that factors is how closed the system becomes without any new input.
Thirdly it helps keep illicit and venal activities in check. Leaderships which allow people to handle money and gives a particular group immense power, it is inclined to be misused, but this cycle of replacement provides enough deterrance for things to not go haywire,and any trangressions if done are likely to be revealed in time.
Although the idea of a periodic system of change in leadership is a logical one and is widely followed throughout the world, but it has its peculiarities; one of the major drawbacks is the break of momentum when the leadership changes, especially in ongoing projects; secondly the leadership often comes into power with their own manifesto and startsimplementing that instead of continuing some great projects from the previous leadership. Nevertheless the practice is still wildely accepted and beneficial because the pros beat the cons of the system of rotating leadership and to solve the cons there is often a system of bureaucrats who remain constant inbetween leaderships, hence the idea is a good one anyway.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'Often' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: Is Often
...ion or instatement of a new leadership. Often is the case that individuals working day i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'minds putting'.
Suggestion: minds putting
...at job, it is a natural tendency of out minds to put things in order to how it works best. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 268, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
... deterrance for things to not go haywire,and any trangressions if done are likely to...
^^^^
Line 19, column 441, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
... projects from the previous leadership. Nevertheless the practice is still wildely accepted ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, as to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2171.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 435.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9908045977 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05083022603 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554022988506 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.8768749658 60.3974514979 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.071428571 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0714285714 23.4991977007 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.21951772744 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165526189508 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546729779666 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416546487474 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787532372217 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350125458169 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.