Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The topic raises the issue of enterprise revitalisation through new leadership. The assumption is that those in authority should step down after a five year tenure. Indisputably this has some element of truth in it. However, one could argue that such transitions leave a vacuum that may not be in line with his successor’s policy causing disruptions in acheiving major milestones.
However, this is not always the case as many at times, the predecessors goals eventually reaches completion especially if his sucessor has a similar line of vision. There has been some cases where those in power needed to step down even before end of tenure their (which is usually four years) becaue they could not handle the issues before them or maybe they had some certain type of scandal which could taint the company’s brand. In this case, i support the author’s position that new leadership is required. My point being that what is not broken should not be fixed. If the current leadership is not performing to expectations or effectively, then a change in power is acceptable.
Notwithstanding this is not always the case, in some instances, a visionary leader may need to be in power for a long time in order to actualise his vision. For instance, the case of Steve Jobs. He was the founder of apple and CEO of Apple. At some point, he was kicked out of the company because his ideas were becoming ludicrious. This however backfired because Apple was not doing so well in the market. At some point he had to be brought back in order for the company to retain its dominant posiiton in the markey. Apparently, Steve jobs had a vision that no one could see and this is only fitting since he created the product. Hence, this evidence demonstrates that the path to success for any company is not always leadership change.
Lastly, another instance to further buttress my point is in the case of my country Nigeria. Nigeria is an abundant rich country with bad leaders. Howwever from time to time, fate strikes us a good hand and we get a great leader who implements favourable policies. Once election year comes, this great leader is changed and for an incompetent one who comes and discontinue these policies in order to pursue his own selfish agenda and recoup money spent on getting him into office. In such a case as this, it is always better to allow this great leader to stay in office a while longer until a suitable successor can be found. Another example is in the case of a family business where the owner of the business death causes his empire to crumble.
In conclusion, although there is some sense to author’s reason especially if the person is authority is underperforming, this does automatically mean that power change is the surest path to business success. A visionary or highly performing authority should be in power until a suitable and worthy successor is found. Thi would prevent instability and chaos and ensure that great milestones are acheived.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...the company's brand. In this case, i support the author's position that...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, hence, however, if, lastly, may, so, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2481.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 511.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85518590998 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77020646055 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526418786693 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 791.1 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.5642918838 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4230769231 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6538461538 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84615384615 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13488188642 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399528211567 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576098661279 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848192788962 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459803603411 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.