Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the ext

Essay topics:

Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

Business, politics, education and government are the four crucial factors to evaluate the progress of a country. Without proper leadership and management in these sectors, a nation cannot be developed. I strongly agree with the statement that the tenure in these areas should be for five years for a particular leader or a group because it is necessary to keep pace with the newest innovation and this can be done by the leadership of the new participants in the mentioned paths.
Firstly, it is important to keep moving with fast growing society and revoutionary inventions of science. We can see different innovations and novel ideas being flourished every now and then and a leader should be aware of the latest discoveries of these tools and techniques to implement those in his respective field. Moreover, power must not be accumulated only by some people, it must be earned through proper examination and after gathering enough knowledge about the phenomena which are significant to lead in the various arenas. Furthermore, the suitable candidate must be given the priority over the hierarchy of power. For example, if Steve Jobs, the founder of renowned company Apple, thought that only he and his progenies will lead the company then this company would have been vanquished by any other companies like Samsung, Nokia and so on.

Secondly, If power in one particular person or a team is being prolonged than five years, then reluctance or haughty mentality may arise in the mind of a leader or a leading group in corporates, education and government as well. The existing leaders might feel that nothing can stop them to do whatever they want. By this parochial thinking they will easily eschew from their duties and obligations towards the organizations or the society as a whole. The consequence of this will badly impact the institutions they are in charge of. But if they know that they are to lead for five years then they will not be able to think in a negative way.For this reason, five years duration in leadership role is expected.

However, some might refute the statments by stating that, experience is a more crucial factor than subject or theoretical knowledge. Some People might also think that if the leaders know that their obligations are for only five years then they will do their duties in a slapdash manner which will be very serious issue for these organizations. After that, it can be posited by some people that, in five years interval the institutions will encounter various type of changes in the management side which will hamper the very uniqueness of these areas.
In a nutshell, according to the Chinese philosophy light and shadow, it can be mentioned that nothing in this world has only positive sides or only negative sides. Everything has some pros and cons and it is our duty to adopt the positive aspects of a thing just the negate the negative effects of the thing. In this scenario, a five year period leadership has more positive sides than the negative ones and thus, I strongly feel that this method should be implemented in every sphere of life.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 173, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...ations and novel ideas being flourished every now and then and a leader should be aware of the lat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 625, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ars then they will not be able to think in a negative way.For this reason, five years duration in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 643, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
... not be able to think in a negative way.For this reason, five years duration in lea...
^^^
Line 6, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...experience is a more crucial factor than subject or theoretical knowledge. Some P...
^^
Line 6, column 267, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a slapdash manner" with adverb for "slapdash"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ve years then they will do their duties in a slapdash manner which will be very serious issue for th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...pt the positive aspects of a thing just the negate the negative effects of the thing. In t...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2578.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 525.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91047619048 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67630503059 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491428571429 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 819.0 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4491464874 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.684210526 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6315789474 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129979964672 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03896860146 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347817991611 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0748136681868 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302275215401 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.