Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
While I agree with the claim that today's governments should ensure to adequately fund their cities in order to thrive, I disagree with the reason put foward that the cities possess the cultural traditions of a country.
A country is known internationally mainly by its cities. The major cities of a country are mostly the most developed and industralised. They have the most advanced technologies and the education system in the cities are at higher levels that those in the rural areas. It is vital that these amenities and facilities are maintained, and that is the responsibility of the government. They need to direct the adequate finances to ensure the these facilities are maintained and optimized.
However, I disagree with the reason for the claim. A country is known and venerated internationally, mainly by how developed and advanced its cities are, and not by the cultural traditions, much of which they do not really possess. Many of the top cities in the world are known because of industralisation, modernisation and civilisation. Let us consider Paris, the Frech capital. Many people visit Paris from other countries to buy clothes and expand their fashion businesses. This makes Paris, and indeed France to thrive in the international stage, and benefit from the number of transactions carried out within it. Therefore the French government should put in the right amount of money to develop Paris. It is not because of the cultural traditions in Paris. Note that many known French traditions are not really extant in Paris, but in other parts of the country.
On the other hand, the rustic and bucolic parts of a country should not be left out in financial allocations by its government. The rural parts of France are known to preserve and generate most of the culture and traditions that France is known for, including milk and cheese production. It is the responsibility of the French government to develop all parts of the country.
In conclusion, it is the government's responsibility to ensure that both the cities and the rural parts are given the adequate funding. The cities need the right amount to maintain and develop the infrastructure and technologies. This is because they help give a better international image of the country, and not because of the cultural traditions. Indeed it is the pastoral towns and countryside communitites that give better information about the culture and tradition of a country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 620, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... of transactions carried out within it. Therefore the French government should put in the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 26, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...he country. In conclusion, it is the governments responsibility to ensure that both the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 350, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...not because of the cultural traditions. Indeed it is the pastoral towns and countrysid...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, really, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2048.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09452736318 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01686636041 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425373134328 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0643937688 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0909090909 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268186822707 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747188144861 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624363639515 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165099340506 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692670998398 0.0667264976115 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.