Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them.
This topic raises a controversial issue whether educators should find out what students wants to study and include it or not. This issue is increasingly important for students. Indisputably, Educators should find out what student like to study and include it in curriculum. Nevertheless, it is also important that measure all factors that happen in future due to this assertion. Generally, I disagree with the opinion that educators should find out what students want and included in curriculum.
First of all, I would like to point out that diffrent students have diffrent tendency regarding subject, so managment of all these subjects is bit tough if we think as a management team of school. To illustrate, let us look at the example of primary school. In primary school diifrent students like diffrent subject, For example 60 students like to include computer subject in curriculum and 10 students likes yoga subject, 5 students likes general knowledge subject. Now this variety of subject school management does not manage efficiently and particular for 5 students who like general knowledge subject and offers to it? it is not more deep sound. consequently, it is obvious that educators considers whole scenario and apply to it.
Furthermore cost factor is also increase if educators include all courses which likes to students. Specifically all students have a different choices. Consider scenario where students like to study different courses and school recruit different faculty according to the subject, so it is major overhead of school due to variety choice of students. Both comman sense and personal experience have told us that it is pretty tough to apply in school and collages
Admittedly, This is true when it comes to specific areas like if particular school provide some new course which like to students, So student efficiently study his course and acquired good knowledge about it. Generally, it is human tendency that we like to do work that we really like. If author mention that find out what course majorly like in students and included in curriculum than it is more plausible. However, the above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum
In Conclusion, although educators should find out what student want and included in curriculum but it is also important to measure all factors that happen in future. As long as some measurments are performed or some areas are involved auther assertion still holds. In fact if author extends his assertion and broadly define than it is more plausible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'bitten'.
Suggestion: bitten
..., so managment of all these subjects is bit tough if we think as a management team ...
^^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts like diffrent subject, For example 60 students like to include computer subjec...
^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...de computer subject in curriculum and 10 students likes yoga subject, 5 students...
^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m and 10 students likes yoga subject, 5 students likes general knowledge subject...
^^
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... manage efficiently and particular for 5 students who like general knowledge subj...
^^
Line 3, column 631, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ral knowledge subject and offers to it? it is not more deep sound. consequently, i...
^^
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...ffers to it? it is not more deep sound. consequently, it is obvious that educators considers...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ers whole scenario and apply to it. Furthermore cost factor is also increase if educato...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'choice'?
Suggestion: choice
...cifically all students have a different choices. Consider scenario where students like ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llages Admittedly, This is true when it comes to specific areas like if parti...
^^
Line 7, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...students want included in the curriculum In Conclusion, although educators should...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 157, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...tant to measure all factors that happen in future. As long as some measurments are perfor...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oadly define than it is more plausible.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, really, regarding, so, still, for example, in conclusion, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20047169811 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77014029298 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438679245283 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.419653647 60.3974514979 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85 5.21951772744 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379803742409 0.243740707755 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144428147985 0.0831039109588 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.200889857814 0.0758088955206 265% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253987186315 0.150359130593 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155015785559 0.0667264976115 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.