Essay topic 32: In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Everyone has different perspectives for any particular cases. Humankind often encounters some difficulties in a specific issue, as they may have not recognized the other sides of issues. Therefore, it is viable to take other views towards those subjects as this enables individuals to mull over advantages and disadvantages which consequently lead to progress and success.
To begin with, there are many social reforms that just started with unity of a few people at first to express their contradictory opinions about political issues, traditions and customs. For instance, women witnessed the abolition of some social conventions which resulted in objecting to staying home and leading to breaking this norm and providing job opportunities for women to demonstrate their capabilities and become successful professional that is considered a great progress. Galileo’s claim against church teachings that the earth orbits around the sun is another example of this case. If many scientists had not declined his claim, we wouldn’t have had improvement in various areas of physics; thus, such opposing views led to progress.
In addition, emphasis on group discussions would help find out merits and demerits of issues which would pave the way to improve. For instance, a business entity needs to promote their products by picking up some marketing and advertising strategies. However, such strategies are criticized by some. Therefore, opposing point of views takes all positive and negative aspects into consideration which ultimately aims to progress in that business. Passing laws in a country is also another good example of importance of debating on issues to get improved. Before a law is going to be passed in the legislator, it is put under tremendous debate between the ruling party and opposite party to look carefully into the law considering both advantages and disadvantages of the issue before making social decisions.
However, it is argued that discussions with some rigid people would have no fruitful outcome. It might happen that one side is probing the issue wisely whereas the other side may have either bias based judgment or power. At last, such discussions result in a dangerous dead lock situation. For instance, approximately ten years ago people opposed to the government for not revealing the accurate number of votes in Iran. These discussions and situations should be headed under the control of a moderator/ arbiter to control the uproar and conflict.
To conclude, even though there are some side effects of contradictory views like bias, people must scrutinize both sides of issues and study the opposing ideas to find out their weaknesses and strengths to progress. Thus, the advantages of considering the contradictory views to improve outweigh the disadvantages far in number and pave the way for progress.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 467, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'great progress'.
Suggestion: great progress
...cessful professional that is considered a great progress. Galileo's claim against church te...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 315, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: far
...s to improve outweigh the disadvantages far in number and pave the way for progress.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, whereas, as to, for instance, in addition, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2425.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41294642857 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96718540941 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573660714286 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 756.0 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0733718048 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.25 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186964281522 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538663749318 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407985121266 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101781307775 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229067564622 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.