In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.
Author’s claim “In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people”, in my opinion holds credence as until and unless people will not able to understand the emotions of the artists in the arts they might able to acknowledge it to an expected level. Following are reasons for my accordance towards the author’s claim.
Firstly, Many novels, movies, poem, or songs are written by artists with some social message which he/she want other people to acknowledge. If in such case, a layman is not able to construe the social message imbibe in work of art, then the main motto after the work of art would not get fulfilled. One might argue that work of arts cannot be categorized into having merit or not having merit as in work of art, artists true emotions are represented. Here author have not define merit if merit implicates the translucent nature of art i.e. anyone layman or novice artists can understand the work of arts.
Secondly, Artists also create work of art to motivate people, to provide strength to people, etc. If people not able to understand the work of art would they will able to get motivate? Thus, work of arts should be elucidated and understandable. Consider an example, Amitabh Bachchan had written great poem ‘Tu chal’, representating the girls dilemma by questioning to society about why every time girl need to prove her purity. His poem also motivates girl to stay strong. Such piece of arts should be truly understand, It provide different perspectives of the artists and sometimes motivates people to bravely face all situations.
Thirdly, Many works of arts depicts social status of the society which represents good as bad points of the society. Artists make such piece of art in hope that people would understand the current status of society and work towards to mollify the condition of the society.
However, One might argue that if merit is evaluated on the basis of acknowledgment many great artists work are acknowledged despite being obscure to layman. Consider an example, Picasso, many faced problem to interpret the message behind the artists work but still people consider his work estimable because of its intricate nature. Thus, it is very difficult task to categorize artists work on the basis of merit.
On wrapping up, For making work of arts to be acknowledge to an expected extent and allow to construe the social message attached to work of art, artists work should be understandable. However, many artists work are acknowledged by people because of its intricate nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...s with some social message which he/she want other people to acknowledge. If in such...
^^^^
Line 4, column 473, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'defined'.
Suggestion: defined
...s are represented. Here author have not define merit if merit implicates the transluce...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 347, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'girls'' or 'girl's'?
Suggestion: girls'; girl's
...'Tu chal', representating the girls dilemma by questioning to society about...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 534, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
... of arts should be truly understand, It provide different perspectives of the artists a...
^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 91, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'construing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: construing
...owledge to an expected extent and allow to construe the social message attached to work of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, third, thirdly, thus, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2214.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 440.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03181818182 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76412600328 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463636363636 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0855233685 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.526315789 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1578947368 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400811634299 0.243740707755 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125065504695 0.0831039109588 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100779184575 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212881588965 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108950519268 0.0667264976115 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.