People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
The author states that people who make decisions based on emotions and explain those decision with logic later are poor decision makers.I partially agree with the author that some emotional decisions can not be justified with logic but the next statement made by the author that they are poor decision makers is not completely plausible.
Its normal in some situations to think emotionally rather than mentally and which at that time is considered logical according to the situation and individual. As there are lot of instances in life that can not always be considered logical but according to the circumstance it is the most logical decision and especially for humans who have a tendency to think emotionally.For instance if a person has to fire a person from job because of his incapability to perform better but the person to be fired is extremely suffering from financial conditions and does not have anything else in his hand then the person logically according to his business and logic should fire him but he does not emotionally because he understands the conditions the person is going through. Hence, every situation helps decide if the situation is logical or not logical but that does not make the person taking the decision poor decision maker.
But, some may not agree with this statement because some people think the decisions taken should be always logical rather than emotional as it may not be good decision if taken emotionally and there are examples where the person should definitely think logically rather then being emotional as at that time even if they define the decision taken emotionally as it may not be considered a good logical decision sometimes.For example we often see that old people often do not want to live after their close ones die and which makes them emotional and if that decision of not living is termed logical then it won't be something people would accept hence its not always important that an emotional decision is considered to be logical and here we can apply that they may be poor decision makers but not in general just for that duration.
Therefore, i don't concede with the author completely as the decisions we make are according to the situation or for a short time period and it may be logical or emotionally logical in that case both are equally right but that does not conclude in general that the people who make emotional decisions and then term it as logical are poor decision makers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...th logic later are poor decision makers.I partially agree with the author that so...
^
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ho have a tendency to think emotionally.For instance if a person has to fire a pers...
^^^
Line 5, column 738, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly because he understands the conditions the person is going through. Hence, ever...
^^
Line 5, column 791, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is going through. Hence, every situation helps decide if the situation is logical...
^^
Line 9, column 271, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...hould definitely think logically rather then being emotional as at that time even if...
^^^^
Line 9, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...define the decision taken emotionally as it may not be considered a good logical ...
^^
Line 9, column 422, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...dered a good logical decision sometimes.For example we often see that old people of...
^^^
Line 13, column 14, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...st for that duration. Therefore, i dont concede with the author completely as t...
^^^^
Line 13, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e make are according to the situation or for a short time period and it may be lo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, then, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2046.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89473684211 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60051698382 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.394736842105 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 674.1 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.2370786517 30% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 69.0 23.0359550562 300% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 243.138277986 60.3974514979 403% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 341.0 118.986275619 287% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 69.6666666667 23.4991977007 296% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 14.3333333333 5.21951772744 275% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 10.2758426966 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.518703340711 0.243740707755 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.326448579388 0.0831039109588 393% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.207601438382 0.0758088955206 274% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.420414738122 0.150359130593 280% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170696763321 0.0667264976115 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 36.4 14.1392134831 257% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 1.44 48.8420337079 3% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.92365168539 184% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 30.2 12.1743820225 248% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.27 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 29.6 11.2143820225 264% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 30.0 11.7820224719 255% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.