People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.

Essay topics:

People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.

People are of different types. Not everyone will take the decisions in same way. Some will make the decisions based on emotion and some others based on logic. It is one's own right or everyone has the freedom in choosing a way to make decisions. Here it says that people who make decisions based on emotions and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. I do not agree to this statement.

When people make decisions based on emotion it does not mean that the person is weak or is wrong. When one person makes a decision based on emotion it conveys that the person takes into consideration of the emotions of himself as well as others. Giving importance to one's emotions is a great thing for the person being suffered.It makes the person feel that someone is there for him to support instead of feeling abandoned.

An example which portrays the situation is, a depressed person. For a person in depression, it is necessary to support that person mentally. Logically it may be wrong in some situations but while considering emotionally it is a great relief for that person to be supported.

Also justifying the decisions logically afterwards shows that he is able to tackle the situation without making others uncomfortable. When he explains with logic, it will be quite convincing for others.

Thus these people are not poor decision makers. Everyone has the freedom to take decisions based on emotions or logically. It is one's comfort which makes him choose the way to make decisions.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...as well as others. Giving importance to ones emotions is a great thing for the perso...
^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...eat thing for the person being suffered.It makes the person feel that someone is t...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...f for that person to be supported. Also justifying the decisions logically afte...
^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...will be quite convincing for others. Thus these people are not poor decision make...
^^^^
Line 15, column 130, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s based on emotions or logically. It is ones comfort which makes him choose the way ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 2235.4752809 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 259.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9111969112 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66141099434 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 215.323595506 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478764478764 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5369931424 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.8235294118 118.986275619 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2352941176 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11764705882 5.21951772744 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.526539619998 0.243740707755 216% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190900786179 0.0831039109588 230% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.221526418365 0.0758088955206 292% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314924544105 0.150359130593 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.207915239085 0.0667264976115 312% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 14.1392134831 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 100.480337079 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.