People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
The recommendation stated is partially correct. There are situations were decisions need to be taken based on the emotion rather bring stolid on the objectives. In today's world there are many problems that are dealt considering emotions like stopping civil war, helping the minors who are being exploited by the dominants, dealing with terrorism and natural disasters. Despite the assertions that emotion leads to bad decisions it is imperative that sometime emotion pays an deciding role in making decisions. On one hand decision should be based on strict criteria which cannot be weakened by emotions, on other hand emotions also play an important role on formulating decisions.
Chief reason for my view are the situations were human being has to bring in emotions for the welfare of humanity than to think for a restricted group. For example, if there is a commander who is looking a terrorist executing the innocent minors has to bring in emotions to take a decision. This decision can set an example to showcase that peace and harmony should prevail at any cost by eradicating the negative forces.
In contrast, there can be situations were people follow their instincts to help or support their loved one without analyzing the negative impact of the decision. It might lead to a poor decision which might not be proved at later stage. Finally we can say emotion can either lead to a deal maker or a breaker.
Another reason for my view is bringing in emotions while dealing with natural disasters and humanity. Let take an example, in case of a natural disaster decisions need to taken based on emotions by seeing the misery of the people. On other hand, it can lead to more loss if the negative aspect of the situation is not taken care off. Thus we can conclude that decision can be made mentally as well as emotionally.
After weighing both the sides the view mentioned should be more descriptive to recommend that decision makers take poor decisions while bringing in emotions.
In my view the decision makers should take their decision depending on situations which can force a head to either listen to his/ her heart or mind based on which he can achieve his/ her goal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 473, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...s imperative that sometime emotion pays an deciding role in making decisions. On o...
^^
Line 9, column 238, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ich might not be proved at later stage. Finally we can say emotion can either lead to a...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 172, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[5]
Message: Did you mean 'take'?
Suggestion: take
...of a natural disaster decisions need to taken based on emotions by seeing the misery ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 335, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...of the situation is not taken care off. Thus we can conclude that decision can be ma...
^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e mentally as well as emotionally. After weighing both the sides the view mentio...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, look, so, thus, well, while, as to, for example, in contrast, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91957104558 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59941657997 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495978552279 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0251395089 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.941176471 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9411764706 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284323671754 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991864265263 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694756218607 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162410859395 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538747458378 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.