People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
The statement aptly stating that any decisions that based as an emotional reaction or response to any event/situation/incident could never be the sane decision. Human are intellectual beings and emotion consists of major part of our cognitive system and, help us to make good or bad decisions in our daily life. However, we can all admit that decisions is apt when the process involves both emotion and rational thinking.
Let us take an example of a teacher and student. Suppose there is a mischievous and nonchalant student in the class, who is always misbehaving and perturbing the decorum of the class. Despite of teacher's multiple warning, the student remains same and therefore, incorrigible. Then the teacher decides to give extreme punishment to the student (make be like expelling or suspending him), so that he could set an indelible example to other students, about the consequences of such misbehaviour. The later part shows explains teacher's action, is not fair. As a teacher whose job is not just to check the decorum of class or being pedantic, but to help in the moral and intellectual development of EACH and EVERY student, by implementing various tools and technique.
Similarly, when parents deal with their fervid kids and want to inculcate discipline on them, they could be extremely harsh to them sometimes. To learn disciple is necessary for a child but parents should keep in their minds that every child is different and therefore, the teaching technique should be unique to each of them. Simply expecting too much from their kids and punishing them if they don't see desirable result(s) is an act based on emotional decision. It shows how emotions could turbid our rational mind and we could take certain decisions based on it, which would be regretful to even us later.
Giving an explanation to justify our actions based on emotional factor could be just a psychological defence system that we develop to protect ourselves from any self-regret. We tend to justify our every decision and act so it could be less embarrassing for us. But our inner concise knows that actions or reactions based on emotions could never be hundred per cent accurate. Therefore, a proper amalgamation of rational and emotional thinking is required to form any good decision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 153, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to disciple'
Suggestion: to disciple
...emely harsh to them sometimes. To learn disciple is necessary for a child but parents sh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 397, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...m their kids and punishing them if they dont see desirable results is an act based o...
^^^^
Line 13, column 350, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ctions based on emotions could never be hundred per cent accurate. Therefore, a proper ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06878306878 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93083130235 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550264550265 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0929555749 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.705882353 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2352941176 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.82352941176 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175976185202 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589978579662 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567553408482 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120673293434 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076044576535 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.