Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
Corporations are an essential aspect to our society and our environment; how they operate reflect our world and its standing position, whether it be in a negative light or a positive light. The prompt depicts the fact of various opinions regarding the contribution of corporations in our society; some people have the belief that companies need to encourage our universe's well-being while other's aver that the companies should focus on their own financial gains. I strongly agree with the primary opinion and advocate that the benefits of society be looked into during corporate procedures for two reasons.
The promotion of well-being throughout the society could actually benefit the company as well and therefore perform a two-in-one tactic. The functioning of society is bolstered by salubrious performances and perceptions. Such functions lead to the buttress of the economy and as the economy is strenghtened, the corporations simultaneously obtain an advantage in many cases. For instance, a wealthy and venerated firm could promote the dangers of drinking and driving via a meticulously constructed eye-chatching advertisement. Assuming the plan elicits favorable results, such a commercial developed by a popular company will catch the attention of many viewers, thus leading to social awareness, which could lead to a betterment of the society by mitigating the dangers on the road. These tactic might lead to more customers for the company due to the impressed individuals wanting to support such a firm that is solicitous and looks out for the commonfolk. Thus, the promotion of such well-being could be beneficial for both the society and the company.
The opposition of promotion of the well-being can severely attenuate the society. What is a corporation without its customers? If a corporation is performing in a corrupted or tenuous environment, they how much progress would they see in the future? In India and other Asian countries, there is a myriad of skin-lightening creams advertised to the market. Such companies have atrocious commercials where they substantially denigrate a darker complected individual and laud the fairer skinned person. For example, the company that sells "Fair and Lovely" creams depicted an advertisement where a woman of a medium skin tone was denied a job and degraded as the employers took in the light-skinned girl. Upon using the marketted cream, the original woman obtained a lighter-skin tone and the commercial portrayed that she obtained the job due to this. This spreads a very negative light in society and enhances the diffidence and insecurities that one might feel due to such colorism/racism. This toxic environment could in the future lean to the company's defame once or if the countries start to become more broad-minded and decide that they do not want to support a corporation with such narrow-minded thinking.
Although corporations may deem that their profits would not increase due if they paid attention to the individual's well-being, many conjectures display that it could actually benefit them. It could lead to the attraction of more consumers based on their portrayal of well-being while also preventing becoming notorious with their negative factors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 786, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this tactic' or 'These tactics'?
Suggestion: This tactic; These tactics
... by mitigating the dangers on the road. These tactic might lead to more customers for the co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, look, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2748.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 507.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4201183432 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15018234369 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53057199211 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 840.6 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6117493581 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.857142857 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7619047619 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197166135628 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622060784586 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458655825259 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120139681119 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304132386654 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 164.0 100.480337079 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.