Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-
being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that
the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to
make as much money as possible.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your
own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing
and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented
A question is usually raised in public discussion: should corporations be oriented only to increasing profits or should they be committed to the wellness of the society in which they operate? In what follows, I will defend the position according to which corporations are responsible for a good development of society.
First of all, making profits as much as possible without worrying about the conditions of society seems to be ethically wrong to most of us. Indeed, the consequence is an unequal distribution of richness and power. That is to say, the owner of a successful activity is far more powerful of a common citizens; if he does nothing to diminish this discrepancy, the social systems in which his corporation operate can hard be defined as democracy.
Not only is the no-responsibility position immoral, it can imply negative consequences. For example, suppose that a certain factory only tries to achieve his goal of increasing his profit indefinitely. Moreover, imagine that the state in which it is located has not formulated particular environmental rules yet. Of course, even if the factory raised the level of pollution, its actions would be legal. Yet, most of us think that such a factory should not have increased the amount of pollution.
Of course, there are some objections that some people may move against the position I am supporting. For example, it could be objected that corporations can augment the wellness of society just by increasing their profit. Indeed, the higher their profit, the healthier the economy. However, this seems to be a gross idea. The discrepancy between rich people and poor people, and the risk of a non-democratic system cannot be prevented, as well as the possibility of environmental problems. Yet, some people may insist by arguing that requiring that a corporation has the responsibility for the wellness of society is too much. After all, people are not committed to this ethical duty; why should corporations be? However, first it is not completely true that people do not have such a duty: you must not damage the environment in which other people live. Second, the analogy between people and corporations is suspect. The impact that a corporation can have on a society is greater; the greater the power the more the responsibility.
In conclusion, corporations should be responsible for the wellness of the society in which they operate. Arguing the contrary faces both ethical problems and negative consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'citizen'?
Suggestion: citizen
...tivity is far more powerful of a common citizens; if he does nothing to diminish this di...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, well, after all, for example, in conclusion, in fact, of course, as well as, first of all, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2086.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16336633663 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06360457194 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497524752475 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2253369225 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8181818182 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13636363636 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319957044332 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901317873974 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895821794775 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190743269582 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906806471218 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.