All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is
In today's modern world with galloping progress in technology and science, the students' courses plays a pivotal role in acadamic society. Since, there are a lot of courses and sources which student have to study, and this issue making them confused. While some people thinks that history courses are necessary for students and they should learn about their past, I strongly believe that children are not required to do so. I feel this way for some reasons which are pinpointed in the following.
To begin with, studying history courses is wasting of time for students who do not major in history. Student had better concentrate only on their main courses so that they could be proficient in their sphere. If their bookstore replete with wide varieties of books in different field, they would not to focus on their major and would be a jack of all trades, while we live in the world where being skillful and adept in an area guarantee the success and prosperity of an individual. My personal experience would be a compelling evidence for this issue. When I was in high school, we had to study history and geography according to our educational criculum. not only all my classmates studied these courses by reluctant, but also it took a lot of our time. We could enjoy our adolesence instead of studying this useless materials. neither I majored in history, nor I even remember one of the topic which i have studied.
Another paramount points which should be take into consideration is that many years ago people refered to history in order to get advice solve their problem. On the other hand, now a dayas, whith the state of the art facilities and modern technology, the problem utterly different from the past, since the appearance and essence of the difficulty differ compeletly. For example, in the past people used to fire, stone and wood so that they could put a fire for their cooking. While, today, we use oven or microwave apparatus. If we smell some different smell from our kitchen, by reading history books, we cannot found it is related to emit of gas from gas pipe of our kitchen.
In conclusion, by taking account all the above reasons and many others, i personally believe that studying history not only time consuming, but also not useful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... progress in technology and science, the students courses plays a pivotal role in...
^^
Line 2, column 658, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Not
... according to our educational criculum. not only all my classmates studied these co...
^^^
Line 2, column 831, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Neither
...ead of studying this useless materials. neither I majored in history, nor I even rememb...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'taken'?
Suggestion: taken
...nother paramount points which should be take into consideration is that many years a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
... the other hand, now a dayas, whith the state of the art facilities and modern technology, the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, of course, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79487179487 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52786703934 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9590894413 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290003115338 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835622175454 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069402043227 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16592585489 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582219969189 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.