Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives
Hiring employees for entire lives of businesses, not only affects employees but also businesses as a whole. Both have their own issues associated with respect to various factors such as job market, skills, areas of interest, financial issues, etc.
Employees hired by businesses have their own areas of specialization. Hiring them for businesses entire life would be completely absurd. Businesses need to cope up with the changing needs of the world. Whether such an employee would be able to adjust to such changing needs is not guaranteed completely. This might prove fatal for the business who pays employee for the work that he does. If considered from employee point of view, they too need to move out of workplace in order meet the changing needs of the world in order to keep themselves updated.
Financial reasons might take place at both the business and employees point of view. Employees who are capable enough to work or sustain might seek to have pay which suits to the work done by them. On the other hand, employees who don't do anything are just for the sake of money and might prove to be fatal for businesses financial conditions. Even business might waste a lot of their earnings on such employees, instead of seeking continuous flow of employees in and out of their organizations.
Although, it might sometimes prove advantageous for businesses as hiring employees for their lifetimes might cut a number of costs on factors such as marketing, resource management groups, recruiting groups, etc. But this might prove fatal for the people or employees who work in such teams. Hiring capable employees might help to strive business, but if a long run view is taken into consideration, might stultify the knowledge that exists within the business.
Also, uncertainty of markets might be risky for employees who have guaranteed to work for such businesses as long as it is running. Financial losses might force such employees to work under strenuous conditions even when the salary is not up to the mark. For example, we can consider, the economic fall of U.S in the year 2008, which caused thousands of employees to leave their jobs as well as savings associated with businesses to whom they might have committed their entire lifetime. Such a situation is to be taken under consideration by the employees and even businesses before they try to hire employees for their entire lifetime.
Hence, I completely disagree with such a statement and some freedom must be given to employees within their own organization with respect to the bonds that such businesses try to make. Even from employee point of view, they must try to avoid such businesses which require employees to work for their lifetimes. Business, on the other hand might prove to be successful when they continuously update their employees with some fresh minds being recruited every year instead of keeping their employees stagnant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reas of interest, financial issues, etc. Employees hired by businesses have their...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...p with the changing needs of the world. Whether such an employee would be able to adjus...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 232, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... them. On the other hand, employees who dont do anything are just for the sake of mo...
^^^^
Line 17, column 309, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...we can consider, the economic fall of U.S in the year 2008, which caused thousand...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, well, for example, such as, as well as, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2451.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06404958678 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69871331979 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444214876033 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 718.2 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1221596904 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.409090909 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445537511782 0.236089414692 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180399857629 0.076458572812 236% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124374992947 0.0737576698707 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293013049326 0.150856017488 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564508227474 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.