Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Compared with people who live in urban areas, the people who live in rural areas can take better care of their families.
Family, as we all know, is our wealth. Although it may seem exaggerated, at first sight, one may find the debate about family sensible. In this regard, many people support this opinion that people who live in rural areas can take better care of their families rather than urban areas. Contrary to common belief, I believe that living in urban areas merits outweigh its demerits. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that people who live in urban areas experience better conditions is opportunities. As we all know, people inborn with the natural instinct to stay in nature. Nevertheless, nowadays, people become inform about the advantageous of urban areas and migrate to take these advantageous sooner. To illustrate, today’s people do not look at rural areas as a living place; conversely, they try to migrate and sometimes commute just for refreshments. despite people`s nature, opportunities induce people properly. People understand that living in urban areas can fulfill their desire, take opportunities, and participate in advanced educational or career courses; therefore get a much more satisfactory position in life. Based on an experiment that has been done recently, results showed that in contrast to common belief, the satisfaction rate of people who live in urban areas is upper than the average level.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is the depth of relationship. Although may critics challenge this idea and suggest that people who live in rural areas can better reunion the family bonds, people show a different point of view, as a whole. Despite the fact that people in urban regions endure much smaller families and also the majority of them have to live in small homes; nevertheless, they know the family values as well as all human kinds. Indeed, because of the scarcity in time of which people endure, although the relationships become limited, the depth of it is remarkable. Take my personal experience as an example, a couple of years ago, I had a friend of which her parents worked a lot and came home late, and the time they spent at home was low. I always thought that she would be disappointed with her situation, and would blame her parents because of the length of the time they were absent. Surprisingly, when they gathered at home, they showed an excellent relationship with a lot of compassion and love. I understood that the depth of a relationship would show the quality of it. Therefore, even if we live together but do pay no attention to each other, we fail in our relationships. Thus, besides all unfavorable incidents related to living in urban areas, some benefits will cover these disadvantageous.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that living in urban areas not only bring better opportunities but also provide the depth for the relationships.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 494, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Despite
...ometimes commute just for refreshments. despite people's nature, opportunities ind...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, conversely, first, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2475.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11363636364 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89331970595 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52479338843 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 784.8 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6928992792 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.608695652 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0434782609 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82608695652 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404419540373 0.236089414692 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110298394448 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10322268051 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255128264497 0.150856017488 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961422867793 0.0645574589148 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.