Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is difficult for teachers to be both popular(liked by students) and effective in helping students in learning.
Professors have difficulty to be effective in helping students in education. While some teachers are popular among students and are good at teaching a subject effectively, others only follow one way whether to be a teacher liked by students or have an ability to educate students meritoriously. It is so controvertible for professors to have both of the characters. In my view, teachers could not be the ideal which to be popular and effective. Once they become popular among students, they could not inspire students about lectures, keep the relationship between teachers and students, and frequently follow a topic about their lectures.
To begin with, teachers could not attract students to lectures if students started to like them. Most students would be curious about writing down the notes about the lectures they are interested in because they adore listening to an ordinary off-topic conversation instead of class material. For example, when I was a high school student, the teacher I was intriguing taught English in a classroom. Even though he was good at teaching English, I just tried to hear his talks about icebreaking. Therefore, I could not concentrate on the lecture anymore. From this perspective, it would be difficult for teachers to be both popular and effective.
Secondly, the relationship between professor and student breaks down when the teacher becomes popular. Generally speaking, the attitude of students in a class is so generous and polite because teachers are higher than students in the hierarchy between them. On the other hand, if students like their professors, they definitely pretend to show their attitude in a school with the same friendship as their friends. Consequently, they would not be keen on taking a class even if their teachers acquire the advanced method to teach students about some subjects.
Finally, a teacher who constructs popularity and effective teaching way often derails a topic about a class. Some lecturers try to talk about a general topic soon after starting a lecture such as news, political issues, and what they ate at dinner time, and so on. After that, students getting into the professors by a curiosity try to inflate the topics more and more. As a result, it would be limited time to teach some ample class materials by teachers every lecture even if they are good at teaching their expertise.
To sum up, it is demanding for lecturers to be both popular and effective to teach students in a lecture. I surely believe that professors could not push students on studying, retain the relationship between them, and follow the schedule they created by derailing topics about classes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2232.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13103448276 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80604258993 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475862068966 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5249044938 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.285714286 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47619047619 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349381363068 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130518625511 0.076458572812 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919753539341 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231808259592 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864413654383 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.