If you want to recommend a way to reduce living expenses for your friend, which of the following will you choose? Why?
1. Find a roommate to share a room
2. Do not buy the latest mobile phone, buy new technological devices less frequently
3. Buy cheap foods and cook home
Since the dawn of civilization, people has been tried to reduce their costs of living. In this regard, there is a long-standing discussion among individuals about which way is the most efficient way to reduce our expenses. Some people may hold the view that sharing a room with a roommate, others prefer to spend less money on technological devices, while some others may be inclined to cook homemade foods and pay less money for ready meals. If I want to recommend to my friend one of these solutions, I strongly believe that sharing a room is the most beneficial solution to this problem. I will elaborate on this for three reasonable reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that people dedicate much more money to their accommodations than their technological equipment and their foods, especially in highly crowded cities. It would be no exaggeration if someone says that finding a roommate can save more budget than other options. Take myself as an example, I live in Tehran, the capital of Iran. The population density has led to increasing rental range in Tehran. In this regard, people who live there like I required to spend more than of their salaries on rental expenses. Meanwhile, food prices and technological devices are much cheaper. In this regard, that’s why I believe that sharing a room could be the best solution.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that those who share a room with other people can take full advantages of this phenomenon. No one can neglect the fact that living with a roommate not only positively impact on our expectations but also individuals have the opportunity to share other expenses like Car, furnishing and bill costs, to name but a few. According to a recent study that has published in Economy magazine, more than 80 percent of immigrants who immigrate to Australia prefer to share a room with others due to high-cost lease. Additionally, this research has shown that people that choose this lifestyle are more thriving than others who try other methods and can boost their financial status sooner than others.
Finally, yet important, It is generally agreed that technological advancements are developing at a galloping rate. And refusing to chase and buy the latest equipment is sometimes inevitable. Additionally, people are more pressed for the time and cannot dedicate lots of time to make homemade foods. Also, taking ready meals and going to restaurants can be a great way of losing anxiety and stress. Thus, removing this part of expenses can damage human satisfaction.
In brief, one can logically draw the conclusion that the sharing a room in the most beneficial way for reducing our costs in terms of high rental costs especially in metropolitan areas, sharing other expenses like bills and furnishing costs. However, there are other reasons and examples, challenging this claim and not mentioned above. All in all, it is highly recommended that a survey can assess the profound results of this selection on people’s economy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, thus, while, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2531.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 502.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04183266932 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80677856353 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511952191235 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 801.9 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7360934901 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.458333333 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.91666666667 5.45110844103 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152749375624 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451294898382 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342125439395 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879837773838 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307848512896 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.