Schools should ask students to evaluate their teachers. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Typically, teachers are supposed to access their students performance in school. On the contrary, students should also evaluate their teachers in order to give the feedback of courses to teachers, to better meet the studying demands of students and to help teachers adjust to their teaching methods.
As teachers, they are also eager to know the courses’ feedback. Asking students to evaluate their teacher is one of best way to obtain feedback. According to students’ comment, teachers are able to get informed whether or not their performance helpful and efficient. For example, my math teacher requires us to make some comment about his class at the end of each semester. Because of no certain name on the comment paper, we honestly and truly write down what we think about the math course. in fact, our elevation usually do good for our math teacher.
Mostly important, through our elevation, teachers can know our students’ demands and therefore try their best to satisfy students requirements. As a matter of fact, if our students studying demands are greatly met, we would boost our study interests and efficiency. As a result, students can make better and obvious progress with study. For instance, last semester, our math teacher assigned too much homework to us. What’s worse, he did not ask us to summit these homework so that we did not know whether we were right or wrong. In my view, this kind of homework just wasted our time. Thus, our elevation included this one and finally our math teacher did not give us this assignment this semester. Consequently, it is unnecessary to waste our time and we have more time to do other homework.
Acquiring evaluation from students helps teachers know students’ demand and then accordingly change their teaching methods. Stable teaching methods can always make a difference. To achieve high quality teaching and create better study atmosphere, teachers have to adjust to their teaching methods to satisfy most students’ demands. If my math teacher did not cancel that sort of homework, we not only complain about him but also have a lower learning efficiency.
In a word, the elevation from students contributes to apparent and beneficial results. Both teachers and students are beneficial from it. Therefore, I strongly agree that school should ask students to access their teachers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the best'.
Suggestion: of the best
...udents to evaluate their teacher is one of best way to obtain feedback. According to st...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ment, teachers are able to get informed whether or not their performance helpful and efficient...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 503, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...wn what we think about the math course. in fact, our elevation usually do good for...
^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this homework' or 'these homeworks'?
Suggestion: this homework; these homeworks
...os;s worse, he did not ask us to summit these homework so that we did not know whether we were...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, finally, honestly, if, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, kind of, of course, sort of, as a matter of fact, as a result, in my view, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20052083333 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80127849152 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510416666667 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0670017255 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8260869565 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6956521739 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30434782609 5.45110844103 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168122755079 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657579346589 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842684459168 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135797630077 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717767208452 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.