Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
In today’s life, many modern buildings are being built. However, there are many debates about whether to keep the old buildings or destroy them for the sake of newer more modern ones. I am of the opinion that saving the historical buildings is of a great importance. I feel this because the old buildings can give us a lot of precious information, and because they attract many tourists from all over the world. I will explore my reasons in the following essay:
First, I think that by studying historical building we can learn much about many aspects of peoples’ life who were living a long time ago. There are many ways that archeologists gather information about the past. However, studying buildings is a great method. Buildings are the prominent hallmarks’ of peoples’ culture, religious beliefs and the available technologies and so on. By a way of example, In Isfahan, a religious city in my country, there are many buildings that dates back to the time that the city was mostly influenced by religious kings In many parts of the city there are buildings with special architectures with beautiful miniaturists’ paintings on the front that represent how they were affected by religious believes. On the contrary, in another city called Shiraz, the study of old buildings’ architecture shows that the kings who were living there for a short period of time were mostly westernized. By studying these building and the dates they were built, we can find out how much the kings were influenced by religions.
In addition to the invaluable information, the historical buildings attract many tourists, and this can improve the city’s economic growth. There are many eager tourists traveling all over the world. If you ask them why they want to visit a especial city, many of them would say that they like to learn better about a city with an interesting background. Although there are many tourists who would rather visit modern buildings, an enormous number of them yet rather go to historical buildings. For example, in my country, the most visited cities by the tourists are the ones that kept and protected their historical buildings, and they have provided many job opportunities for the people there.
In conclusion on the basis of the aforementioned agreements, I would like to reiterate that I believe that keeping historical buildings is very beneficial. I feel this because they can tell us a lot about the people who lived before us, and because they are a great way to attracts tourists and visitors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 418, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... many tourists from all over the world. I will explore my reasons in the followin...
^
Line 2, column 909, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...kings who were living there for a short period of time were mostly westernized. By studying th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... If you ask them why they want to visit a especial city, many of them would say t...
^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... them would say that they like to learn better about a city with an interesting backgr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, for example, i feel, i think, in addition, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2129.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03309692671 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94709653712 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45390070922 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 661.5 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.4463064948 48.9658058833 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.277777778 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230976375743 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864835400258 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056900951256 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150512356798 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726705347592 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.