Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why?
Resources for people in their countries are increasing these days. People are getting enough resources even though they are not employed. Like, in Canada even you don't have any job the government will give the citizen a basic amount of money for living. There are still some people who beg these days. Many people think that we should help the beggars. That would be the right thing to do. But, personally I think giving money to beggars is not a good thing to do.
First of all, why do people beg for money? To get the basic needs like, food and shelter. There are many shelter places in a city provided by the government and these beggars can go there and stay. For example, there is a shelter in my town which provides living area to the poor and also provide food to them, but still I can see that the shelter is half empty. There are some big companies who donate money to these shelters. Still poor people don't use these privileges provided to them by the government.
Secondly, people who beg can find a job instead. Most of them would be uneducated, but there are some jobs which include only physical work. I saw a person who do not have any physical disability was begging for money. Instead of begging he can go to some companies which include man power, like lifting goods. Getting a job is way better than begging.
Third, we should not encourage the beggars. This would only increase their laziness. They would think that, “if I get some money which will cover my food charges then I don't have to work anymore”. So, by discouraging the beggars and not giving money to them will make them think and look for work which will help them to improve in their life and a better future.
There are some people who still think giving money to the beggar is the right thing to do. But, I think these actions of beggars has to be refuted. This would make more energetic and they can use the shelters provided by the government efficiently and they can count on to their better future. If not giving money to the beggars continue, I think this would increase the societies’ value as well as the people who are changing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... not employed. Like, in Canada even you dont have any job the government will give t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...ies who donate money to these shelters. Still poor people dont use these privileges p...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ey to these shelters. Still poor people dont use these privileges provided to them b...
^^^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...which will cover my food charges then I dont have to work anymore'. So, by disc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, then, third, well, as to, for example, i think, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54381443299 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28678263084 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422680412371 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 541.8 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8304804634 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.8076923077 100.406767564 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9230769231 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96153846154 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339415479932 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111619569202 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121760783876 0.0737576698707 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214179507674 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884515849205 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 11.7677419355 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.46 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.002688172 45% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.